Beware of Improper Ambition
Sunday School Lesson for March
2, 2003
Background
Passage: 1 Kings1:1-2:46
Focal Teaching Passages: 1 Kings 1:1-53; 2:1-25
An Aging King (1:1-4)
In this first section of the chapter the author reveals
the declining health and vigor of King David and the attempt by his servants to
revive and invigorate him. This action must be understood in light of the
ancient belief that the “physical and sexual vigor of a king was a matter of
national concern. It was believed that there was a definite link between his
natural powers and the power and effectiveness of his rule” [Richard Nelson, First and Second Kings, Interpretation,
16]. It is easy to see how this sets the stage for the challenge to his
throne that will occur in the verses that follow below.
David’s health was such that he
was unable to “keep warm,”
apparently due to poor circulation (v.1).
His servants who attended him decided to bring in a “young virgin” to “lie beside him” in order to correct the problem (v. 2). According to some authorities, this action
was in keeping with an ancient medical practice for persons with similar
conditions [Donald
Wiseman, 1&2 Kings, TOTC, 67].
After an intense search “throughout Israel”
the servants found a “beautiful girl”
named “Abishag” who was brought to
the side of the king in order to wait upon him (vv. 3, 4). The author makes it
clear, however, that David “had no
intimate relations with her” (v. 4). We are not told whether this was due
to David’s moral strength or was simply a result of his physical condition. At
any rate, his servants surely must have believed that if even a beautiful young
woman was powerless to stir the aging king, “then he obviously [was] not long
for the world” [Paul
House, 1,2 Kings,
NAC, 88-89].
An Ambitious Son (1:5-10)
With David’s health and vitality
in question, the foundation is now set for a serious challenge to his throne by
his own son “Adonijah.” In verse 5 we learn that Adonijah “put himself forward” and arrogantly
declared his intentions to be Israel’s
next king. The mention of the “chariots
and horses” and the entourage of “fifty
men to run ahead of him” further reveals his
presumption and the impropriety of his actions. Wiseman suggests that his claim
to the throne was based upon the concept of primogeniture—the
bestowal of royal rights to the eldest surviving son [68]. The text also indicates that
Adonijah had endorsements from significant personalities in Israel
including both “Joab” and “Abiathar the priest” who provided him
with “their support” (v.7). The
significance and effectiveness of this tactic should be clear enough to modern
readers who “recognize the importance of an entourage of limousines and
security personnel for a political celebrity” [Nelson, 16].
The sacrifice of the animals at “the Stone of Zoheleth” was done as an
attempt to solidify his support, especially among “all his brothers” (v. 9).
Note also the mention of the “royal
officials” of Judah
who were being courted by the crafty Adonijah. This makes it clear that the sacrifices
were purely for the purpose of winning their favor.
A New King (1:11-53)
This section recounts the efforts of “Nathan” and “Bathsheba” to alert David to Adonijah’s plot to become king. The
key phrase in this section is found in Nathan’s well-devised question to
Bathsheba in verse 11—“Have you heard
that Adonijah . . . has become king without our lord David’s knowing it?” This action prompts Bathsheba to go directly
to the king in order to confront him with the facts of Adonijah’s intentions (vv.
15-21). In verse 17 she reminds her husband that he had made a solemn
promise to place Solomon on the throne of Israel.
As her encounter with David continues, Bathsheba employs a four-fold strategy
in her attempt to stir the king to quick action [see House, 91-92]. First, she implies that
David is no longer fully aware of the status of his kingdom (1:18). Second, she identifies those who have
come forward in support of Adonijah (1:19).
Third, she claims that “all Israel”
waits to see whom David will chose as his successor (1:20). Finally, she states that upon David’s death, she
and Solomon will “be treated as
criminals” (1:21).
Verse 24 continues the drama with
Nathan approaching David himself to bring the news of Adonijah’s plot to him
personally. Again Nathan employs a timely question to garner the king’s
attention—“Have you, my lord the king,
declared that Adonijah shall be king after you . . . ?” This is followed by another pointed and
somewhat sarcastic query in verse 27—“Is this something my lord the king has done without letting his
servants know. . . ?”
At this point David succumbs to the pressure placed upon
him by Nathan and Bathsheba and quickly moves to have Solomon anointed as king
(perhaps named coregent until David’s death) by Zadok the priest and Nathan the
prophet (1:28-40). With a simple declaration from the lips of David, Solomon is
named “ruler over Israel and Judah”
(v. 35). House observes that the nation of Israel
had never secured a king in this manner. In previous times both Saul and David
had been selected and identified by Samuel. Additionally, both men “had to
prove themselves worthy in the people’s eyes, and neither Saul nor David began
to rule all twelve tribes immediately. The placing of Solomon on the throne
signals the beginning of the Davidic dynasty, a royal lineage that will
eventually produce Jesus Christ” [93].
Verses 41-53 recount how Adonijah
learned of Solomon’s anointing and immediately began to fear for his life. This climaxed with an agreement between the
two men that would allow Adonijah to live provided he “proves to be a worthy man” (1:52).
A Father’s Charge (2:1-9)
As David prepared himself to die,
he took time to offer an earnest “charge”
to Solomon that would ready him for service as king of Israel
(v. 1). Upon examination, one will find
that David’s words contain both deeply spiritual advice as well as
“cold-blooded political counsel” [House, 95]. His charge
consists of two principle sections. Verses 2-4 contain David’s spiritual
counsel to his son. Solomon is called to know and carefully obey all that is
written in the “Law of Moses” (2:3).
Note the key verbs “observe,” “walk,” and “keep” that form the essence of Solomon’s responsibilities before
God (v. 3). In other words, Solomon is now responsible to keep the sacred
obligations associated with the Mosaic covenant. By living in such a worthy and
obedient manner, Solomon would be made to “prosper”
in all things and his nation would never lack for “a man on the throne” (1:4). Far from being an unconditional promise
of economic and material prosperity or a “magic” formula for guaranteed
success, David’s words served as a call to absolute loyalty to the God who had
so powerfully saved and blessed Israel.
The many blessings associated with covenant loyalty were evidences of God’s
infinite mercy and longsuffering faithfulness toward His people. Wiseman reminds us that in Israel,
“the king was never the source of law but rather under it, for the covenant law
was imposed on king and people alike” [76]. In this regard, Solomon was obligated to
act as the paradigm of covenant living in humble submission to each of Yahweh’s
commands and precepts.
The second part of David’s charge
to Solomon, verses 5-9, dealt with the elimination of any political
enemies, especially “Joab”
(2:5). It was this man who represented
the single “greatest threat to Solomon’s shaky hold on
the throne” [House, 97]. While David encouraged Solomon to be wise in
his dealings with Joab, he urged him to make certain that he would not be
allowed to “go down to the grave in
peace” (2:6). David also warned
Solomon about “Shimei” who had
previously cursed the king (2:8). In regard to this slippery character the king
bluntly orders his son to “Bring his
gray head down to the grave in blood” (2:9). David’s ruthless counsel
should be understood in light of the ancient belief that words, especially
curses, had intrinsic power. Nelson explains the situation:
Even though
David had pardoned Shimei for his crime (II Sam. 16:5-11; 19:21-23), his “grievous curse” (lit. the “sickening
curse”) still hung suspended over David’s house. Since David’s own oath to
Shimei was also irrevocable, he was unable to do anything about the problem.
Solomon, however, was free to take action and arrange a violent death in order
to disarm the curse. [24].
A Reign Established (2:10-46)
With the death of David the reign
and rule of Solomon was “firmly
established” (2:12). This
provoked the determined Adonijah to make one final effort to undermine the
authority of Solomon. Approaching Bathsheba, he made the ridiculous claim that
all of Israel
had wanted him to be king—“the kingdom
was mine” (2:15). He requested that Bathsheba approach king Solomon requesting that he grant permission for Abishag
to become his wife (2:17). When
Bathsheba brought this request to Solomon, however, he exploded in anger and
gave the order to have Adonijah executed (2:25). This violent response to Adonijah’s request
makes sense when one understands that Abishag was the last of David’s concubines.
In ancient days “whoever possessed the harem controlled the kingdom” [House, 99]. Thus,
Solomon saw this as clear evidence that Adonijah had every intention of
continuing his subversive quest for the throne.
Key Themes for Reflection and Application
One: God’s faithfulness displayed in the
fulfillment of His promises—God’s promise to David to place his descendant
on the throne of Israel
was fulfilled through Solomon, the divine choice (see 2 Sam. 7:5-16). As we have already noted, this covenant faithfulness
ultimately climaxes with the incarnation and redemptive ministry of Jesus
Christ, the true King of Israel.
Two: God’s sovereignty
displayed in the course of history—Solomon received the throne because he
was God’s choice. God’s sovereignty and transcendent purposes “operated behind
unworthy human motives and plots” [Nelson, 22]. This truth finds its ultimate expression in the
cross where we see that God is fully in control of “the crooked plots of the
politically powerful (Acts 4:27-28),
working through human evil to save [His] people in the end” [Nelson, 22].
Three: The foolishness
of pride and self-promotion—The behavior and
violent demise of Adonijah should serve as ample warning regarding the sin of
pride and self-advancement. We must remember that the Lord will humble those
who selfishly seek personal exaltation (see Matt. 23:12).