Understanding God’s Compassion
Sunday School Lesson for December 28, 2003
Jonah’s Response to God’s Mercy (4:1-4)
After Jonah had delivered God’s message to the people of
The reason for such a response to
the Ninevite revival becomes clear as Jonah’s prayer of protest is
examined. Once more Jonah “prayed to
the Lord” and confessed that he “knew” of Yahweh’s nature as a “gracious
and compassionate God, slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness” (v.
2). Jonah fully understood, from both
His revealed Word and His mighty actions in the history of the nation of
Note that Jonah admitted that
this attitude—one that betrayed a basic belief that the Jews alone were the
special objects of God’s redemptive love—led him to attempt a detour to “Tarshish”
(v. 2). It is very possible that Jonah
was personally embarrassed by such divine attributes as mercy and compassion
and had come to view them as “regrettable weaknesses in the divine make-up” [Alexander, 127]. At
any rate, Jonah wanted
The first section comes to an end with a simple, yet penetrating, question from the Lord—“Do you have good reason to be angry?” (v. 4). Again, it is ironic that Jonah had just expressed his frustration with God concerning His lack of anger. Now, however, the Lord confronted the prophet with the presence of his own self-serving wrath.
Jonah’s Response to the Withered Vine (4:5-9)
Apparently having no satisfactory
answer to the Lord’s question, Jonah departed to the “east” of Nineveh
to a desert area and sat down under a home-made shade. There he waited to “see what would happen
in the city” (v. 5). Perhaps Jonah believed
that given sufficient time, the Lord would “reconsider his position and exact
retribution upon the Ninevites” [Alexander, 128]. As the
prophet observed the action (or lack thereof) in the city, “the Lord God
appointed a plant” to grow “over Jonah” providing him with
additional shelter from the “discomfort” of the hot sun (v. 6). Note that this is the exact same language of
divine action as employed in 1:17. The word “appointed” is used
exclusively in this book with God as its subject and “stresses God’s sovereign
rule over events for the accomplishment of his purpose” [
Verses 7-8
However, in the
same way that the Lord had “appointed” the plant to shield the prophet
from the sun, He likewise “appointed a worm” to attack it (v. 7). Eventually, the plant “withered” and
died leaving Jonah fully exposed to the blistering heat. To make matters even worse for Jonah “God
appointed a scorching east wind” to come up. (v. 8).
With this, the conditions became completely unbearable to the point that Jonah
“became faint and begged with all his soul to die” (v. 8). Having tasted
of the goodness and mercy of the Lord with the provision of the shade, Jonah
was suddenly confronted with the reality of God’s judgment, albeit on a small
scale. His ensuing despair—“Death is
better to me than life”—resulted from “a deep spiritual malaise, from which
the Lord [was] seeking to rescue him” [
Verse 9
As before, the Lord confronted
Jonah with a searching question regarding his attitude: “Do you have good reason to be angry about
the plant?” Jonah’s response, however, once more revealed a futile attempt
at self-justification and rationalization—“I have good reason to be angry, even
to death.”
The Lord’s Response to Jonah’s Anger (4:10-11)
At this point, the real spiritual
lesson being brought to bear upon Jonah was fully exposed. The Lord challenged
the despairing prophet with the fact that he had demonstrated “compassion”
for “the plant” which had been provided for him—one that “came
up overnight and perished overnight” (v. 10). Yet, Jonah was deeply angry
with the Lord for displaying His “compassion on
One : Consider some of the ways that we are like Jonah. Is it possible that we sometimes believe that certain persons are unworthy of being saved by God, or are outside the scope of His mercy? What was wrong with Jonah’s logic here? Hint: Look at Romans 3:9-18.
Two : Think about the way God’s sovereignty is displayed throughout this book. Why has the author so emphatically declared God’s control over the affairs of men? Do His sovereign purposes negate the reality of human accountability? See if you can defend your answer by appealing only to this book.
Three : Why did the Lord mention “animals” in 4:11? Hint: Keep the context in mind (4:5-10).